Search found 2415 matches

by Bandobras Took
Thu Apr 19, 2018 8:29 pm
Forum: Rules & Errata
Topic: Full Spoiler List
Replies: 4
Views: 72

Re: Full Spoiler List

Actually, some stickied "Document Update" threads might not be a bad idea at all.
by Bandobras Took
Thu Apr 19, 2018 1:46 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Tidings of Bold Spies
Replies: 10
Views: 119

Re: Tidings of Bold Spies

That would be my interpretation, yes. There is an automatic-attack, but it is only defined while being faced.
by Bandobras Took
Wed Apr 18, 2018 10:06 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Tidings of Bold Spies
Replies: 10
Views: 119

Re: Tidings of Bold Spies

I believe: Tidings of Bold Spies would create an attack which states "Opponent may play as an automatic-attack one non-unique hazard creature from his hand normally keyed to X". The opponent would then play a creature if possible, and the attack created by Tidings would take on the relevant attribut...
by Bandobras Took
Wed Apr 18, 2018 9:33 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Tidings of Bold Spies
Replies: 10
Views: 119

Re: Tidings of Bold Spies

Tidings of Bold Spies only copies attacks, not effects that allow certain creatures to become automatic-attacks. This is a bit convoluted, but bear with me: Automatic-attacks (2): (1st) Trolls - 3 strikes with 9 prowess (2nd) Opponent may play as an automatic-attack one non-unique hazard creature f...
by Bandobras Took
Wed Apr 18, 2018 1:30 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Tidings of Bold Spies
Replies: 10
Views: 119

Re: Tidings of Bold Spies

Special: If Balrog of Moria is in play or if it or Durin's Bane has been defeated, the first automatic attack is canceled. Any non-Dragon Lair site with more than one automatic-attack is reduced to having one automatic-attack of the hazard player's choice (cannot be canceled). If we were to accept ...
by Bandobras Took
Tue Apr 17, 2018 10:07 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Deep Mines/Ancient Deep-Hold connectivity
Replies: 10
Views: 1311

Re: Deep Mines/Ancient Deep-Hold connectivity

Konrad Klar wrote:
Tue Apr 17, 2018 9:08 pm
I know that such interpretation makes an use of Deep Mines cumbersome. I do not know (and I'm unable to reconstruct) what was intentions of creators.
Many things in the game end up cumbersome for precisely that reason. :)
by Bandobras Took
Sat Apr 14, 2018 3:55 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Ringlore with Rumours
Replies: 3
Views: 49

Re: Ringlore with Rumours

This is one I could see getting a change in wording, since I think the intent was descriptive, yes.
by Bandobras Took
Sat Apr 14, 2018 3:22 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Uvatha Unleashed
Replies: 2
Views: 42

Re: Uvatha Unleashed

To be clear: Ringwraiths may not use region movement. Dwar Unleashed is the only exception to this rule. Ringwraiths may not move from a non-darkhaven site to a non-darkhaven site. Dwar Unleashed is the only exception to this rule. Ringwraiths may always move to a Darkhaven site. To move to a non-Da...
by Bandobras Took
Sat Apr 14, 2018 3:11 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Ringlore with Rumours
Replies: 3
Views: 49

Re: Ringlore with Rumours

That reasoning seems valid, yes.
by Bandobras Took
Sat Apr 14, 2018 3:10 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Starting with Opposite Alignment Minor Items
Replies: 5
Views: 82

Re: Starting with Opposite Alignment Minor Items

That is an error: Deck Construction Only Ringwraith players may include minion characters, resources, and sites in their decks, while only Wizard players may include hero characters, resources, and sites in their decks. However, there is an exception to this: a Ringwraith player may use any hero ite...
by Bandobras Took
Sat Apr 14, 2018 3:07 pm
Forum: Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: Token of Goodwill
Replies: 5
Views: 68

Re: Token of Goodwill

I agree that it's not urgent, but better language on cards isn't a bad thing in and of itself.
by Bandobras Took
Fri Apr 13, 2018 10:21 pm
Forum: Annual Rules Vote - Submissions
Topic: FEAR! FIRE! FOES!
Replies: 2
Views: 37

Re: FEAR! FIRE! FOES!

Makes sense to me.
by Bandobras Took
Fri Apr 13, 2018 1:54 am
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: Saw Further and Deeper
Replies: 1
Views: 39

Re: Saw Further and Deeper

I believe that since it says "is not revealed" instead of "has not been revealed," it checks for the current presence/absence of your wizard. The Balrog rules summary indirectly indicates that revealing one's avatar is a special kind of character play, so "is not in play" is a reasonable way to read...
by Bandobras Took
Wed Apr 11, 2018 1:36 pm
Forum: Rules Questions
Topic: 3 Questions about Influencing. One for Netrep.
Replies: 19
Views: 1435

Re: 3 Questions about Influencing. One for Netrep.

Again, though, this relies on the assumption that the roll is against the attack in question -- which is reasonable to assume, but it's (in my mind, at least) as reasonable to believe that the roll is not against the attack, but rather just a roll that is then compared to values listed on Token to d...

Go to advanced search